Tonight I attended the monthly meeting of the Scottsville Architectural Review Board as a matter of routine. Despite several failed efforts many years ago to get a seat on this board, I still like to attend to stay abreast of any issues that may effect the historical integrity of the Scottsville Historic District. Of course, some of these issues have concerned my own projects and over the years the ARB has gotten some bad press, sometimes well deserved. To the credit of its members, I have seen the ARB evolve in an effort to bridge the gap between what the ARB is chartered to do and what an applicant wants. The results, I think, have resulted in a more positive experience.
Tonight they discussed some important Town issues. It was announced that the Farmer’s Market plans submitted last month for ARB review and approval were presented by the Town to an area contractor for a cost estimate. The Town Administrator stated the budget for the entire project is around $100,000, but the cost estimate came back at $200,000. The architect of the market building is now seeking a lower cost estimate, otherwise the entire project will have to go back to the Quality of Life’s drawing board in an attempt to lower the price. Hmm, sounds like the Streetscape part 2.
Speaking of Streetscape, there was some very honest discussion on the current state of the “enhancements” and what it has done to the character of the historic district. The Chair of the ARB reported that a delegation of ARB members had walked Valley Street to look at the work thus far performed and found many areas of concern. I applaud the ARB for doing this and speaking up and suggesting the Town needs to treat its own projects in the same manner that it does the plans of a private individual. During the entire project, the Town only asked the ARB to comment on the street light design.
The Mayor once said the current Streetscape efforts are the results of over seven years worth of planning. In year one, I suggested that the Quality of Life Committee, the main overseer of Streetscape, engage the services of its own ARB or that of someone who would be sympathetic to the character of the historic district. I said the same thing in years two and three and finally gave up. So many of the current issues about quality, aesthetics and appropriateness could have been dealt with before the fact rather than after had they heeded my advice and consulted with people who do know something about historic preservation. Positive suggestions have been offered over and again from several sources, but to my knowledge none were ever taken seriously enough to be included in the planning process except one – the need for storm drains. I reckon I am not one of the “key members of the community” the Quality of Life Committee likes to consult with.
The ARB and members of the attending audience put forth some positive ideas that will be summarized and relayed to the Scottsville Planning Commission and the Town Council. Hopefully, the Council will heed this input. I am personally appreciative to ARB for stepping up to the plate on its own accord and being proactive.
I walked home after the meeting sensing a slight ray of hope for the future of the historic district.